The difference between aggregated route and generated route

Generated routes are very similar to aggregate routes, with one exception: generated routes inherit a real next-hop interface, while aggregate routes only allow discard or reject as next-hops.
For example, the following config:
routing-options {
aggregate {
route 192.168.16.0/21;
}
generate {
route 10.0.0.0/16;
}
}
Results in:
lab@lab> show route protocol aggregate
inet.0: 57 destinations, 60 routes (57 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
10.0.0.0/16 *[Aggregate/130] 00:00:04
                   > via so-0/0/0.0 <<<<<<REAL NEXT HOP (inherited from contributor)
192.168.16.0/21 *[Aggregate/130] 1d 08:33:02
Reject <<<<<<Reject is the default (can be configured to discard)
Note that they both show up in the routing table as protcol type Aggregate.